Rolling Updates vs Canary vs Blue/Green deployment strategies

Rolling Updates vs Canary vs Blue/Green deployment strategies

June 7, 2025

In Kubernetes—and DevOps in general—how you deploy can be just as important as what you deploy. A solid deployment strategy helps reduce risk, improve availability, and roll out changes confidently.

This post breaks down key deployment strategies, with practical examples and real-world tradeoffs.

Rolling Update (Kubernetes Default)

  • Replaces old pods with new ones incrementally.
  • Controlled via maxUnavailable and maxSurge.
  • No traffic routing needed—Kubernetes handles everything.

strategy:
  type: RollingUpdate
  rollingUpdate:
    maxUnavailable: 1
    maxSurge: 1

Pros: Simple, efficient, minimal resource cost
Cons: No version isolation—bugs in new pods can affect users immediately

Blue/Green Deployment

  • Two full environments: Blue (live), Green (staging/testing).
  • New version is deployed to Green, tested, and traffic is switched over when ready.
  • Rollback is instant—just point traffic back to Blue.

Pros: Safe, instant rollback
Cons: Requires extra infra and routing control (Ingress or Load Balancer)

How to implement

  • You deploy two versions of your app: Blue (current live) and Green (new candidate).
  • Once Green is validated, you switch traffic to it using your ingress or load balancer.
  • Rollback = switch back to Blue.

When to use

  • Mission-critical apps where downtime is unacceptable
  • You want fast rollback without redeploying
  • You have capacity for two environments

Canary Deployment

  • Gradual rollout to a subset of users.
  • Observability is key—monitor metrics, logs, errors before scaling up.

Example:

5 total replicas
→ 1 pod runs v2 (canary)
→ 4 pods run v1 (stable)

Pros: Real-world testing, minimal risk
Cons: Needs advanced tooling (Istio, Flagger, Argo Rollouts), proper metrics & alerting

How to implement

  • Deploy new version gradually (e.g., 10% of traffic → 25% → 50%)
  • Monitor errors, metrics, latency
  • Promote if healthy, rollback if not

When to Use

  • You want to test new features in production
  • Risk needs to be managed progressively
  • You have observability in place (Prometheus, Grafana, etc.)

Final thoughs

Choosing the right deployment strategy depends on:

  • Risk tolerance
  • App criticality
  • Infrastructure budget
  • Observability maturity

In my homelab, I use Rolling Updates, but I’m actively exploring Canary + GitOps + Flagger for more controlled experiments.