Rolling Updates vs Canary vs Blue/Green deployment strategies
In Kubernetes—and DevOps in general—how you deploy can be just as important as what you deploy. A solid deployment strategy helps reduce risk, improve availability, and roll out changes confidently.
This post breaks down key deployment strategies, with practical examples and real-world tradeoffs.
Rolling Update (Kubernetes Default)
- Replaces old pods with new ones incrementally.
- Controlled via maxUnavailable and maxSurge.
- No traffic routing needed—Kubernetes handles everything.
strategy:
type: RollingUpdate
rollingUpdate:
maxUnavailable: 1
maxSurge: 1
Pros: Simple, efficient, minimal resource cost
Cons: No version isolation—bugs in new pods can affect users immediately
Blue/Green Deployment
- Two full environments: Blue (live), Green (staging/testing).
- New version is deployed to Green, tested, and traffic is switched over when ready.
- Rollback is instant—just point traffic back to Blue.
Pros: Safe, instant rollback
Cons: Requires extra infra and routing control (Ingress or Load Balancer)
How to implement
- You deploy two versions of your app: Blue (current live) and Green (new candidate).
- Once Green is validated, you switch traffic to it using your ingress or load balancer.
- Rollback = switch back to Blue.
When to use
- Mission-critical apps where downtime is unacceptable
- You want fast rollback without redeploying
- You have capacity for two environments
Canary Deployment
- Gradual rollout to a subset of users.
- Observability is key—monitor metrics, logs, errors before scaling up.
Example:
5 total replicas
→ 1 pod runs v2 (canary)
→ 4 pods run v1 (stable)
Pros: Real-world testing, minimal risk
Cons: Needs advanced tooling (Istio, Flagger, Argo Rollouts), proper metrics & alerting
How to implement
- Deploy new version gradually (e.g., 10% of traffic → 25% → 50%)
- Monitor errors, metrics, latency
- Promote if healthy, rollback if not
When to Use
- You want to test new features in production
- Risk needs to be managed progressively
- You have observability in place (Prometheus, Grafana, etc.)
Final thoughs
Choosing the right deployment strategy depends on:
- Risk tolerance
- App criticality
- Infrastructure budget
- Observability maturity
In my homelab, I use Rolling Updates, but I’m actively exploring Canary + GitOps + Flagger for more controlled experiments.